<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abandoned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.friendsofmrb.co.uk/2010/05/abandoned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.friendsofmrb.co.uk/2010/05/abandoned/</link>
	<description>Campaigning for the future of swimming at Moseley Road Baths, Birmingham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: editorialgirl &#187; Moseley Road Baths: &#8220;Derelict&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.friendsofmrb.co.uk/2010/05/abandoned/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>editorialgirl &#187; Moseley Road Baths: &#8220;Derelict&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friendsofmrb.co.uk/?p=336#comment-244</guid>
		<description>[...] pool&#8221;, something that the Friends of Moseley Road Baths picked up on a few days later, saying: &#8220;The article incorrectly describes the swimming pool as abandoned (there is another fully [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pool&#8221;, something that the Friends of Moseley Road Baths picked up on a few days later, saying: &#8220;The article incorrectly describes the swimming pool as abandoned (there is another fully [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

